Before deciding whether to use or evaluate interviews as a method of generating or empirical data, you need to consider the advantages and disadvantages of conducting interviews as discussed here by a dissertation help expert:
- Advantages: The flexibility that interviews allow. In an interview, you can change the course of conversation and focus on suggestions you didn't plan to come up with.
- Disadvantages: The main challenge with interviews is the amount of planning you need to put in, and the amount of follow-up time you need (plus the interview time is taken).
To help you determine who you would like to interview and which interviewing tool to use, you need to consider what kind of data you want to collect. Start by listing the kinds of facts you're trying to discover. It can be difficult to interpret and present qualitative data in a research paper. Section Methods is where the research design needs to be justified and presented. You may also suggest using a table to display the interview results. The data can be tabulated in the Methods section and described succinctly. Or if it's a questionnaire-based analysis, the questionnaire may be given as part of the manuscript's online Supplementary Data – many journals require that.
Referring To Interviews:
If the interviews have been attached to the appendix, you may then paraphrase them in your dissertation. Paraphrasing is completed. You are often not permitted to add an interview transcript to the appendix. This interview can't be cited in this situation.
Quoting From Interviews:
If you copy the interviewee's words literally, then you need to quote them. It's easier to find interesting quotes if you know how to get usable information out of the person during the interview. That is why the interviews should be performed professionally.
Mentioning The Name Of The Interviewee:
Do not just note the name of the person you are interviewing blindly, but ask you two questions:
Are you permitted to mention the name? This is the first question you would ask yourself before using the name of the interviewee in a dissertation. Determine if the name will be listed, in conjunction with the interviewee. In reality, the interviewee often doesn't want that. That might be the case, for example, when you've interviewed an employee and the employee doesn't want his or her supervisor to be able to read the responses because it could disrupt their working relationship. The scenario where this can happen is where the interview involves very personal questions, for example.
Does mentioning the name add anything? The second factor to consider is whether the mention of the name is relevant. Does it contribute anything to your research? If the interviewee is an anonymous person whom you met on the street, the person's name is not very relevant. But if you've met a big organization's CEO, then mentioning his or her name may be quite important. Add a short introduction in this second case, so that the dissertation reader immediately knows who this person is.
Thus, if you have permission from the interviewee to do so and if this is important to the study of your geography dissertation, you will mention the name. You may opt to use a definition if you do not have permission to use the name or if you do not want to mention the name. The main point to remember when presenting qualitative interview data is that the reader should not be overwhelmed with the minute information-mention key points and themes as they relate to the research issue, rather than recording everything the interviewees said; use charts or tables to help the reader understand the data and then highlight the most important findings; analyze the data rather than simply explain it-use it to tell a story based on answering the research question. Essentially stopping very lengthy papers and reporting the key results.